Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 06:06

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What are your darkest taboo confessions?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
The best Apple deals you can shop ahead of Amazon Prime Day 2025 - The Verge
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Android 16 QPR1 Beta 2 tests new Gemini launch animation with vibration - 9to5Google
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Le Mans 24 Hours: Kubica wins with Ferrari as Porsche spoils 1-2-3 - Autosport
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
SpaceX knocks out another national security launch while ULA faces scrutiny - Yahoo